Should we and can we develop an African philosophy of education?: Pedagogy of Sagacity
 
In 1986, Njoroge and Bennaars, published Philosophy and education in Africa; an introductory text for students of education. Since  the publication of this textbook there has been an intellectual aridity  in this area of educational philosophizing in Kenya. This is in spite  of the said textbook being merely introductory or prolegomenon.  More importantly is the model proposed and formulated in this textbook  intended as a conceptual framework for developing an African philosophy  of education (1986; 92). This model has remained un-attempted. 
 
My paper will argue in the affirmative while distinguishing should as a non-moral normative imperative and can as a question of ability. While indeed we should  develop African philosophy of education this imperative remains  unachievable until we have experts with requisite scholarly abilities.
 
 
Problem of shortage of educational philosophers
 
Experts  in philosophy of education are called educational philosophers. They  should be trained in technical philosophy and educational sciences. The  two disciplines must meet in one. To 'meet in one,' means that an  educational philosopher should integrate both technical philosophy and  educational sciences as an integral area of academic specialization.  Educational philosopher is the middle term between technical philosophy  and educational sciences. In other words one should have academic  qualification as a technical philosopher and as a trained professional  teacher.
 
 
Lack of this 'meeting in one' of the two areas  is to blame for lack of resources in this area. It means persons who are  lesser than the ideal are teaching this discipline. There are two types  of categories of teachers of philosophy of education in Africa who are  lesser than the ideal.
 
The generalists and the specialists, the  former are professional educators without philosophical footing. The  latter are academic philosophers without educational training. Both as  Plato would say must be debarred and be made to give way for educational  philosopher.
 
 
Generalists make philosophy of education  be about general principles, aims and goals of education. The technical  philosopher makes philosophy of education too abstract and unrelated to  everyday concerns of professional teacher in schooling. The latter stand  accused of arm chair speculation, the latter stands accused of  generality.
 
  
 
The model of African philosophy of education: Pedagogy of sagacity
 
  
 
Pedagogy  of Sagacity stands on two feet - one foot is planted in Sage philosophy  and the other in Pedagogy of Oppressed - both feet are rooted in the  conceptual model for developing African philosophy of education as  articulated by Njoroge and Bennaars (1986, 88-89).
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
Pedagogy  of Sagacity or Sagacious Pedagogy is developed as an attempt to  transcend the original impetus of the project of Sage philosophy of  Nairobi School. As Gail Presbey states,
 
 
I suggest that  the original impetus for starting the sage philosophy project - the  defense against Euro-American skeptics who thought Africans incapable of  philosophizing - has been outgrown. The present need for studies of  African sages is to benefit from their wisdom, both in Africa and around  the world. I also suggest that the title 'sage' has to be  problematized. While there were good reasons to focus earlier on rural  elders as overlooked wise philosophers, the emphasis now should be on  admiring philosophical thought wherever it may be found-in women, youth,  and urban Africans as well. In such a way, philosophy will be further  relevant to people's lives, and further light will be shed and shared  regarding the lived experience in Africa.
 
Gail concludes by pointing out that
 
Whether,  and in what way, sage philosophy continues and grows will be determined  in part by the ideas of those who have the will to continue it; their  works will help define the terms "sage" and "sage philosophy" in the  future.
 
Pedagogy of Sagacity is contemplated here as a possible  contribution to the development of Sage philosophy in terms of African  philosophy of education. Njoroge and Bennaars (1986, 98) have formulated
 
 
...a  basic framework within which philosophical thinking about African  education must be located. Within this model we identified four distinct  areas of concern each reflecting a specific function of Technical  Philosophy, a specific approach in educational Philosophy and a specific  trend in African Philosophy. These areas of concern are: the  Ethnophilosophy of Education, the Phenomenology of African Education,  the Critique of African Education and the Philosophical analysis of  African Education.
 
 
The authors (1986, 88) intend this to  be a normative 'framework within which to locate educational philosophy  in Africa.' Thus they state that (1986, 89),
 
 
...we can now establish what ought to be  the major features or concerns of an African Philosophy of Education;  thus we may arrive at a MODEL that brings out the specific features of a  truly African Philosophy of Education.
 
 
For this model to be realized two criteria or conditions must be fulfilled, namely technical and African. As regards the former criterion 'an African Philosophy of Education, to be recognized as truly technical, (it) must  display similar functions and approaches as the Technical Philosophy of  Education' (1986, 89). There are four functions of technical philosophy  namely, critical, rational, phenomenological and speculative (1986,  23-24). Corresponding to these four functions respectively are four  approaches to philosophy of education namely, implicational,  existential, critical and analytical approaches (1986, 89).
 
 
With regard to the second criterion or condition African philosophy must be African that  is 'it must reflect the trends characteristic of philosophical thinking  in Africa' (1986, 89). Njoroge and Bennaars (1986, 83-89) have  delineated four trends in African philosophy namely, ethno-philosophy,  cultural philosophy, political philosophy and formal philosophy. Each of  these trends is paired with a corresponding function from the four  technical functions of philosophy. The resulting combinations are four  distinct approaches to African philosophy of education these are;  ethno-philosophy paired with speculative function results in  implications approach in African philosophy of education; cultural  philosophy paired with phenomenological function results in existential  approach; political philosophy paired with critical function results in  critical approach; and lastly formal philosophy paired with analytical  function results in analytical approach (1986, 89).
 
We can  therefore identify 'four major areas of concern, which may be called the  basis ... of a truly African Philosophy of Education.' These are  ethno-philosophy of education; phenomenology of African education;  critique of African education; and philosophical analysis of African  education.
[1]  In Aristotelian causality technical functions of philosophy are the  formal causes while trends in African philosophy are the material  causes. Formal and material causes are co-constitutive principles of  substantial being, the substance of African philosophy of education is  possible within the framework of Njoroge and Bennaars. As Wittgenstein  states (1981;2.14) 'what constitutes a picture is that its elements are  related to one another in a determinate way,' this is 'the pictorial  form' of reality (2.15). In a pictorial form of reality 'a picture ...  attached ... to reality ... reaches right out to it' so that the picture  is 
the measure of what reality should be. (2.1521). The framework of Njoroge and Bennars is the 
measure of what is to be regarded as African philosophy of education.
 
 
Platonic middle term
 
The  model proposed by Njoroge and Bennaars has not yet been worked out in  practice. This could be due to lack of experts who are 'extremely rare'  (1986;78) with the right combinations namely, training in technical  philosophy and training as professional educators (B.Ed). Further still  development of African educational philosophy requires experts with  knowledge and skill in African philosophy. The requirement that African  philosophers of educators be doubled edged experts in technical  philosophy and professional educators (1986; 77-80) is akin to Plato's (Republic Book, V. 473d) observation that
 
Cities  will have no respite from evil ... unless philosophers rule as kings in  the cities, or those whom we now call kings and rulers genuinely and  adequately study philosophy, until, that is, political power and  philosophy coalesce, and the various natures of those who now pursue the  one to the exclusion of the other are forcibly debarred from doing so.  Otherwise the city we have been describing will never grow into a  possibility or see the light of day.
 
  
 
To  paraphrase Plato in the framework of Njoroge - Bennaars we can state  that: Kenya will have no African philosophy of education unless  philosophers teach and research in educational foundations, or  those who teach philosophy of education genuinely and adequately study  philosophy; until, that is, technical philosophy and educational  sciences coalesce in African educational philosophers and the various  scholars who now pursue one to the exclusion of the other are forcibly  debarred from meddling in this area. Otherwise the proposed model of  African philosophy of education will never develop into a possibility or  see the light of day. Plato in the cited place provides a middle term  which logically links technical philosophy and educational sciences in  philosophy of education in Africa. The middle term is a technical  African philosopher who is also a professional philosopher i.e. a  scholar who integrates both technical philosophy and educational  profession. It is from such a one that hope lies for possibility of  developing an African philosophy of education. With such rare experts we  can develop African philosophy of education.
 
 
Pedagogy of Sagacity: Thought Experiment on African Philosophy of education
 
Of  the four trends in African philosophy identified by Njoroge and Bennars  Sage Philosophy is not included, yet Odera Oruka (1990;16-17) includes  it as a distinct trend in African philosophy. There are four trends in  African philosophy identified by Oruka (1990, 13 - 20) namely,  ethno-philosophy, philosophic sagacity, nationalist-ideological  philosophy and professional philosophy. For Oruka (1991,43) 'sage  philosophy comes as a third alternative' it lies between folk philosophy  or (ethno-philosophy) and 'the written critical discourse' or   (professional trend); sage philosophy 'demonstrates the fact that  traditional Africa had both folk wisdom and critical personalized  philosophical discourse.' Sage philosophy is here subjected to  phenomenological analysis within the model of Njoroge - Bennaars in  attempt to develop African philosophy of education. As the model of  Njoroge - Bennaars requires African philosophy of education should be  worked out on two-fold points, firstly, technical method of philosophy  and secondly a trend in African philosophy. To develop pedagogy of  sagacity, phenomenology is the opted technical function of philosophy  while philosophic sagacity or sage philosophy is the trend in African  philosophy; from these two a new area in African educational philosophy  arises namely, pedagogy of sagacity.
 
 
Banking versus problem-posing education
 
Pedagogy  of sagacity is influenced by pedagogy of the oppressed. Paulo Freire, a  Brazilian educationist developed a trend in philosophy of education  called pedagogy of the oppressed (1972). Pedagogy of the  oppressed 'is an instrument for ... critical discovery ... of  dehumanization'. 'The central problem' of pedagogy of the oppressed 'is  this: How can the oppressed, as divided, unauthentic beings, participate  in developing the pedagogy of their liberation?' 'This pedagogy makes  oppression and its causes objects of reflection by the oppressed, and  from that reflection will come their necessary engagement in the  struggle for their liberation. And in the struggle this pedagogy will be  made and remade' (1972, 25). Pedagogy of the oppressed is a  critique of traditional pedagogy that is teacher-centered; the teacher  assumes the dominant role while the learners are passive. In traditional  pedagogy Freire identified two dialectically opposed poles, the  oppressors - who happen to be teachers, and the oppressed - who happen  to be learners. The teacher is in a dialectical opposition to the  learner in which case the teacher has-knowledge but the learner has-not  knowledge, he is assumed to be tabula rasa. Freire employs  analogy of the banking industry to expose ten contradictory pedagogical  'attitudes and practices, which mirror oppressive society as a whole'  (1972, 46-47). The teacher acts as the 'bank-clerk' by use of 'banking  methods of domination'. Freire institutes a pedagogical paradigm shift  where he replaces 'the educational goal of deposit-making ...with the  posing of problems of men in their relations with the world' (1972,52).  This is also called liberating education which 'consists in acts of  cognition, not transferrals of information' (1972,53). The 'practice of  problem-posing education first of all demands a resolution of the  teacher-student contradiction. Dialogical relations - indispensable to  the capacity of cognitive actors to cooperate in perceiving the same  cognizable object - are otherwise impossible' (1972, 53). Iconoclasm of  banking education allows freedom for 'the critical reflection of both  teacher and students' this leads to 'emergence of consciousness and critical intervention in reality.' (1972, 53-54).To contrast 'banking education ... and ... problem-posing education' Freire (1972;56-57states
 
 
...  the two educational concepts and practices under analysis come into  conflict. Banking education attempts, by mythicizing reality, to conceal  certain facts which explain the way men exist in the world;  problem-posing education sets itself the task of de-mythologizing.  Banking education resists dialogue; problem-posing education regards  dialogue as indispensable to the acts of cognition which unveils  reality. Banking education treats students as objects of assistance;  problem-posing education makes them critical thinkers. Banking education  inhibits creativity and domesticates the intentionality of  consciousness by isolating consciousness from the world, thereby denying  men their ontological and historical vocation of becoming more fully  human.
 
 
Freire is in total rejection of banking education  the means for emancipation from 'authoritarianism and an alienating  intellectualism' is to begin with people 'in the 'here and now', which  constitutes the situation in which they are submerged, from which they  emerge.... To do this authentically they must perceive their state not  as fated and unalterable, but merely as limiting - and therefore  challenging.' (1972;57-58)
 
 
Pedagogy of sagacity is an  attempt to develop African philosophy of education.  It is a critical  reflection on possibility of African pedagogy, as Freire notes 'critical  reflection is also action' in the sense that 'action and reflection  occur simultaneously' (1972, 99).
 
Two Typologies of Sages
 
Odera Oruka (1991; 34) identifies two types of sages in Africa, namely, folk sage and philosophic sage.
 
Findings  in Kenya show that there are two main divisions of sage philosophy. One  is that of the sage whose thought, though well informed and educative,  fails to go beyond the celebrated folk-wisdom. Such a sage may not have  the ability or inclination to apply his own independent critical  objection to folk beliefs. He is, therefore, a folk sage in contrast to  the second type of the sage, the philosophic sage. The former is a  master of popular wisdom while the latter is an expert in didactic  wisdom.
 
 
The philosophic sage may know, as the folk sage  does, what the cardinal beliefs and wisdoms of his community are, but he  makes an independent, critical assessment to what the people take for  granted. Thus, while the sagacity of the folk sage remains at the first  order level of philosophy, that of the philosophic sage is a  second-order philosophy, that is a reflection on and a rationalized  evaluation of what is given in the first order. What is given in the  first order is a mixture of conventional-cum-customary beliefs and  practices.
 
 
Oruka (1991, 37) believes that 'There are and  there will be sages even among Africans with modern education' for  instance Nyerere. To be a sage one needs 'to be wise and able to utilize  that wisdom for the benefit of one's community.' 'The concern in the  sage research is not to claim that sagacity is, by definition,  philosophy but to look for philosophy within sagacity, that is, to get  to their overlap.  'Within this overlap, both the philosopher  and the wise man have the same function: they employ abstract reasoning  for the understanding and solution of the basic questions of human life'  (1991, 41). Odera Oruka (1991, 34) carried out his research project in  Kenya. 'One major aim is to look for philosophy or traces of philosophy  in traditional Africa....by talking to the living sages.... Exposing the  value of such thoughts is again one other important aim of the sage  research' (1991, 41). However, most importantly the sage project was  meant 'to help substantiate or disapprove the well-known claim that  'real philosophical thought' had no place in traditional Africa.' This  claim implied that 'existence of philosophy in modern Africa is due  wholly to the introduction of western thought to Africa' (1991, 34). The  invalidation of this claim could only be established if traditional  Africa was found to host philosophic sages. The project was successful  for it identified philosophic sages (individuals with didactic wisdom) in Kenya while distinguishing them from folk sages (individuals with popular wisdom) (1991, 33-34).
 
This  European prejudice is reflected in the work of Mullin J (1965) which  was meant to be an attempt 'to lay down guide-lines for the ...  Christian apostolate in modern Africa' (1965, 3). Mullin (1965, 32-33) contrasts African mentality with European mentality he states: 
 
The  African's reasoning methods are not discursive; he knows nothing of the  syllogism, he thinks inductively rather than deductively; nor is his  thinking analytic: it is intuitive and synthetic .... This is a  mentality different from the European, and to be respected as such ....  One consequence of it is a circular manner of thinking, a collecting of  impressions, a feeling of the way before coming to the kernel of a  problem .... A more important consequence is the primacy in his thought  of the concrete over the abstract; and the human over the institutional  .... European teachers, trained in deductive thought, pass on ideas in a  way impossible for the African to assimilate. They do not square with  his reasoning'. 
 
While the philosophic sage engages in sagacious didactics,  the folk sage engages in narration. Philosophic sagacity is often 'a  product and a reflective re-evaluation of the culture philosophy. The  few sages who possess the philosophic inclination make a critical  assessment of their culture and its underlying beliefs.' They use power  of reason to produce 'a system within a system, and order within an  order' (1991, 49). Folk sagacity is first order culture philosophy. 'It  is absolute in its ideas and truth claims and has an ideological war  with anything to the contrary.' Folk sages 'are specialists in  explaining and maintaining this order.... Their explanations or thought  do not go beyond the premises and conclusions given by the prevailing  culture' (1991, 49). Philosophic sage is critical reflection on the  first order philosophy of culture. It is 'a critical rebellion against  the first order conformity and anachronism'. While the first order  glorifies the communal conformity, philosophic sagacity is  skeptical...it employs reason to assess it. The first order is purely  absolutist and ideological, the second order is generally open-minded  and rationalistic. Its truths are given as tentative and ratiocinative,  not as God-sent message (1991, 49). Further contrast between the two  sage includes (1991, 36)
 
The folk sage is versed in the  common-place culture, customs and beliefs of his people. He can recite  or describe them with much competence.  However, he is unable to raise  any critical question about them, nor is he able to observe the inherent  contradictions. The philosophic sage, like the folk sage, may equally  be versed in the beliefs and values of his society. His main task is to  make critical assessment of them and recommend, as far as the communal  pressure allows, only those beliefs and values that pass his rational  scrutiny. The folk-sage is identifiable by his consistent inability to  isolate his own opinion from the beliefs of the community and his ready  inclination to take refuge behind the popular unexamined wisdom wherever  he is intellectually challenged. The philosophic sage, on the other  hand, is clearly able to isolate the given beliefs of the community from  his own evaluation, rationalization and even criticism of those  beliefs. He is also able to enjoy a dialectical or intellectual game  with the interviewer.
 
 
Mullin's characterization of  African mentality is a fallacious generalization which collapses African  thought to folk sagacity. There are philosophic sages capable of  syllogistic reasoning in Africa both in literate and pre-literate  societies. 'There is possibility for sagacity both in pre-literate and  literate societies' (Oruka 1991, 37). To be a sage is not necessarily to  be philosophic
 
Pedagogy of sagacity
 
Pedagogy  of sagacity uses phenomenological method of philosophy to anayze two  typologies of teachers based on the paradigms of Oruka's two sages,  philosophic and folk sages. This is in attempt to fructify Njoroge -  Bennaars (1986) model or conceptual framework for developing African  Philosophy of education.
 
 
Folkish teacher versus philosophic teacher
 
By  use of phenomenological analysis we can draw implications from the two  sages. Philosophic-sage points to a teacher who is critical and empowers  learners to think for themselves. He uses student-centered pedagogy.  His classroom is community of researchers; his role is to midwife  students in their search for solution to problems. Classroom is related  to real life problems. Folkish-sage points to folkish-teachers who  merely recycle old lecture notes. They do not update themselves they  dictate notes to learners who are expected to be passive recipients.  Such teachers fail to criticize educational theories and practices. They  are authoritarian and aim at making learners memorize notes in order to  pass examinations. Such a teacher fears questions and fails in  self-criticism. The folkish-teacher uses banking pedagogy, while  philosophic-teacher uses problem-solving pedagogy.
 
In the movie Sarafina Mrs. Masumbuka exemplifies philosophic-teacher who is gadfly that stings learners to dare to think, that  is to critically question the received traditions. She midwifes  regeneration of learners as enlightened and emancipated active learners  who demystifies the stratified sanitized syllabus. The teacher who  replaces her is an example of folkish teacher. He can at best impose and  popularize authorized apartheid pedagogical narrative which   is oppressive to the African students. That teacher mechanically  transmits fossilized pre-packaged ideas without critical reflection.  This is a dogmatic teacher who fails to emancipate himself from dominant  oppressive pedagogy of white supremacist in apartheid South Africa.
 
Conclusion
 
Model  by Njoroge - Bennaars is useful in developing African philosophy of  education. Pedagogical Sagacity is a product of that model and proves  that it is pragmatic and relevant to African philosophy of education.  There remains more areas in education in Africa where sage Philosophy  needs to be explored and logical conclusions be drawn to improve  teaching/learning in philosophy of education in Africa, Kenya in  particular. Sage Philosophy furnishes a productive conceptual framework  for educational philosophizing not only in Africa but also anywhere else  where critical analysis of pedagogical theory and practice is to be  carried out. This is a proposal of one possible direction among others  where Sage Philosophy can be relevant beyond Oruka's original concern.  It points at possible contributions of Sage Philosophy (in department of  Philosophy) to educational philosophy (in department of Educational  Foundations).